ReproCoffee is a journal club series where we illustrate and discuss papers about all things reproducibility and open science -- from methodology and statistics, to the way academia sets up good (and bad) incentives. Paper presentations last 10 to 15 minutes, followed by an informal discussion.
The initiative is run by Claudia Mazzuca, Beatrice Valentini, Chiara Fini and Davide Crepaldi.
We meet monthly, on-line, so you're welcome any corner of the world you currently sit on. To take part, you just need to complete this form, and you'll receive an email with a reminder and a link to take part into the event a few days before it happens.
You can reach us collectively at reprocoffee@itrn.org; one of us will always be there for you. Ah, and we also tweet, so that's also a nice way to stay in touch.
NEXT
past
15 May 2024, Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108
Hedges, L. V., & Schauer, J. M. (2019). Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000189
28 November 2023, Better Accuracy for Better Science ... Through Random Conclusions. by Davis-Storber et al., 2023.
24 October 2023, Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals. by Marek et al., 2022
28 March 2023, Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis by Steegen et al., 2016 & Ethics and Statistics: Honesty and Transparency are not Enough by Gelman, 2017.
28 February 2023, Five Selfish Reasons to Work Reproducibly. by Markowetz, 2015
31 January 2023, Measurement Schmeasurement by Flake & Fried, 2020